What This Page Does Defines EFI's models, standards, and teaching posture as an institute-level training system
Primary Use Inspect the models, worldview, and teaching posture behind the curriculum
Best Next Step Move to Curriculum for the full program file or Certification for standards
Institute Dossier

The program is built around visible teaching artifacts

EFI is intentionally document-heavy in public. The institute file is meant to show how the program thinks, what it teaches, and where the reviewed boundary begins.

  • Public teaching surface Curriculum maps, model diagrams, and route pages appear before any paid ask.
  • Operational surface Rubrics, crosswalks, verification, and standards are published as institutional artifacts, not hidden sales collateral.
  • Practice surface Free tools expose the actual explanatory logic EFI uses with parents, educators, and practitioners.
Institute Thesis

Training coaches to function as an external scaffold

EFI sits at the intersection of education, coaching practice, and applied executive-function support, but it organizes those domains into a named teaching system rather than a loose collection of advice.

As awareness of neurodiverse profiles — specifically ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder — expands beyond diagnosis into mainstream educational and workplace contexts, the demand for specialized executive-function support has grown sharply. Yet the field remains largely unregulated, with a significant gap between the quality of available research and the rigor of practitioner training.

Our internal certification pathway is built on the synthesis of multiple theoretical models into a single, actionable coaching framework — one designed to be research-literate, ethically bounded, and practically useful.

Core Philosophy

“Executive function deficits are rarely deficits of knowing; they are deficits of doing. The role of the coach is not merely to teach a client how to use a planner, but to act as an external scaffold while training the client's own neural circuits to eventually assume command.”

What Makes Us Different

Unlike generic life coaching programs, our curriculum rejects the notion of EF issues as "behavioral choices" or "character flaws," instead grounding all instruction in the neuroanatomy of the prefrontal cortex and the developmental trajectory of self-regulation.

Leadership

Who Built This Program

EFI is currently founder-led with transparent ownership and public accountability.

Jacob Rozansky, Educator

Founder and curriculum lead for The Executive Functioning Institute. EFI's model combines open educational access with paid competency review, credential verification, and alumni pathway infrastructure.

Preview of EFI launch kit materials including public-facing operational artifacts and reviewed workflow files.
Founder accountability at EFI shows up as visible operating documents: launch materials, rubric language, route logic, and standards artifacts that can be inspected in public.

Public Accountability Surface

EFI is strongest when leadership is legible in the work itself: published standards, named frameworks, open curriculum pages, and a clear boundary around reviewed evaluator labor.

Model Stack

EFI combines explanation, vocabulary, and coaching procedure

The institute does not rely on one framework to do every job. The visual stack below shows how the program moves from causal explanation to intake language to practical coaching execution.

Mechanism

Barkley explains why the gap shows up at the point of performance

EFI uses Barkley to explain why clients can know what to do and still struggle to initiate, sustain, or regulate action in real time.

Client language

Brown supplies the vocabulary people actually recognize in daily life

The six clusters help parents, educators, and practitioners name the pattern they are seeing without collapsing it into a character story.

Execution layer

Dawson, Guare, and Ward turn the theory into visible routines

EFI uses skills maps and backward-planning methods so coaching becomes a sequence of external scaffolds, not generic accountability talk.

Theoretical Foundations

The Science Behind Our Curriculum

Our program combines three major executive function models into one practical coaching framework, and each model is used for a different kind of judgment.

B

The Barkley Model: Inhibition as the Keystone

EFI chose Barkley’s framework because it answers the question coaches hear most often: “Why can’t my child/student/client just DO it?” His model reframes executive dysfunction as a self-regulation system problem, not a knowledge or motivation deficit, giving coaches a credible, research-backed explanation they can share with families, schools, and referral partners.

The model’s hierarchical structure — a single keystone capacity (Response Inhibition) gating four dependent functions — gives coaches a clear diagnostic logic: identify where the cascade breaks down, then intervene at that level:

Nonverbal Working Memory

The "Mind's Eye" — holding events in mind and re-visualizing them. In Barkley's framing, reduced future visualization helps explain why some clients seem "time blind."

Verbal Working Memory

The "Mind's Voice" — internalized speech. How "self-talk" evolves from external instruction to internal governance.

Emotional Self-Regulation

The "Mind's Heart" — moderating emotional states to sustain goal-directed action. Emotion is not separate from cognition.

Reconstitution

The "Mind's Playground" — the capacity for analysis and synthesis, breaking down behaviors and recombining them into novel solutions.

The Extended Phenotype — Why It Matters for EFI

This concept is the theoretical backbone of EFI’s anti-shame curriculum. When coaches frame planners, timers, and checklists as extensions of the brain’s own regulatory architecture — no different from glasses correcting vision — clients stop hiding their tools and start using them consistently. Module 1 teaches the full theory; Module 3 shows coaches how to introduce it in a first session.

Br

The Brown Model: Six Clusters of Cognitive Management

Dr. Thomas Brown's model provides a more granular vocabulary for describing the daily manifestations of EF deficits. He presents these functions as integrated clusters rather than isolated, independent skills.

EFI uses Brown’s cluster model as the primary client-facing vocabulary because it maps directly to the frustrations people describe in intake sessions. Where Barkley explains the mechanism, Brown gives coaches language for the lived experience — including the Situational Variability pattern that Module 1 explores in depth.

Activation

Coaches use this cluster to diagnose “I know what to do but can’t start” patterns

Focus

Explains both distractibility and hyperfocus as two sides of the same attentional coin

Effort

Reframes inconsistent energy as neurochemical, not motivational — key for parent and teacher education

Emotion

Positions emotional flooding as intrinsic to EF, not a separate comorbidity to refer out

Memory

Distinguishes retrieval failures (“I know it but can’t access it”) from storage deficits

Action

The “internal supervisor” — gives coaches language for pacing and self-monitoring goals

DG

The Dawson & Guare Model: 12 Skills for Coaching

Drs. Peg Dawson and Richard Guare offer the most practical, skills-based framework for coaching. They categorize executive function into 12 distinct skills, separated into two domains: "Thinking" (Cognition) and "Doing" (Behavior).

This separation is crucial — a client may possess high-level cognitive EF (able to plan a complex project) but suffer from severe behavioral EF deficits (unable to initiate the first step).

Thinking Skills (Cognition)

Working Memory Planning Organization Time Management Metacognition

Doing Skills (Behavior)

Response Inhibition Emotional Control Sustained Attention Task Initiation Goal-Directed Persistence Flexibility Stress Tolerance
Applied Framework

The 360 Thinking Model

Sarah Ward and Kristen Jacobsen's methodology is widely used for visual-spatial approaches to time and task management.

Done

Visualize the final outcome first: "What will it look like when I am finished?" This utilizes nonverbal working memory (visual imagery) identified by Barkley.

Do

Once the end state is visualized, identify the specific action steps required. Map the work backward from the finished product to the present moment.

Get Ready

Finally, determine what materials are needed to start. This reverses the typical impulsive approach of grabbing materials without a plan.

Open Source

Our Commitment to Accessible Education

The "open source" nature of this curriculum implies a commitment to lifelong learning — constantly seeking out new research, new tools, and new perspectives.

  • Curriculum built on a mix of public research summaries, cited books, and referenced professional resources
  • Uses free and affordable open-source tools rather than proprietary software
  • Emphasizes data sovereignty and community ownership
  • Reading packets combine written source briefs with links to public materials when available
  • Uses publicly accessible ESQ-R materials alongside EFI's own free web-based tools
  • Curriculum available for independent practitioners to adapt

Cited Research Authorities

Pioneer in ADHD and executive function research. His model of executive functions as self-regulation and the concept of the "Extended Phenotype" form the theoretical backbone of the curriculum.

Developer of the Six Cluster model of executive function impairments in ADHD. His work on "situational variability" is essential for explaining why EF deficits are context-dependent.

Authors of the executive-skills framework and the Executive Skills Questionnaire (ESQ-R). EFI uses their public ESQ-R intake model as one coaching-oriented assessment layer alongside its own interactive tools.

Developers of the 360 Thinking model and the "Get Ready, Do, Done" methodology. Their visual-spatial strategies for backward planning are central to Module 4.

Provides the foundational "Air Traffic Control" metaphor for executive function and publishes the activity guides used as core open-source reading material in the curriculum.

See the Models in Action

Now that you understand the theoretical foundations, explore how each model translates into coaching sessions, assessment protocols, and intervention design across six modules.